Are you looking for no loss Deriv bots?
I completely get you.
When I started out, I was also hunting for that foolproof, stress-free, 100% guaranteed system β a way to win without ever having to worry about losses. And honestly?
I fell for more traps than I care to admit. Scripts that promised the world. Systems that seemed unbeatableβ¦ until they werenβt.
That was over ten years ago.
Since then, the hype has only gotten louder β especially now with TikTok and Pinterest flooded every week with flashy videos claiming to have βcracked the code.β
Just plug in this secret bot, they say, and watch it print money non-stop. No losses. No stress.
Sounds perfect, right?
Hereβs the hard truth: thereβs no such thing as a no-loss bot. Not on Deriv. Not anywhere.
What does exist are recovery tools β smart, calculated strategies that help you bounce back if you understand the risks and use them with discipline.
The reality is, the financial markets we trade are way too complex and unpredictable for any system to guarantee zero losses. Even the best trading strategies β the ones used by professionals with years of experience and sophisticated tools β still suffer losses from time to time, and some of those losses can be very significant.
If you’re aiming for perfection, you’re chasing a myth.
If you’re aiming for consistency with proper risk control, you’re on the right path.
This guide isnβt some hype pitch.
Itβs drawn directly from my personal experience β what actually works, whatβs fantasy, and how to protect your account when using recovery bots the right way.
Letβs dive in.
Min Deposit: USD 1
Total Pairs: 100+
Regulators: MFSA, LFSA, VFSC, BVIFSC
What Is a βNo Lossβ Deriv Bot? And Why Itβs a Trap
When people talk about βno loss bots,β they usually mean scripts or bots that:
- Keep increasing stake until they win
- Promise 94β100% win rate with a few button clicks
- Claim to work with any balance, on any market, any time
Most of these bots come from:
- TikTok videos showing cherry-picked sessions
- Telegram channels selling βVIP versionsβ for $5 or less
- Code repost sites with no explanation or safety guardrails
What they donβt show?
π Blown accounts.
π Loss streaks that wiped 3 months of gains in 30 seconds.
π Or the fact that Deriv can pause, delay, or reject trades when tick volumes are high.
Letβs get real. A bot that tries to recover doesnβt mean it can do it forever. And the ones that chase every loss blindly are the ones that bury your account in the blink of an eye.
How Real Recovery Systems Actually Work
Not all recovery methods are bad. In fact, if you use the right one with proper limits, they can help you manage small drawdowns and hit steady targets. Letβs break down the two big ones.
π΄ Martingale (Fast, Risky)
This is the classic doubling system:
You lose $1 β next stake is $2
Lose again β $4
Then $8 β $16 β $32… and so on
β Pros:
- Quick recovery if the win comes early
- Works well on bots with a 90%+ win rate
β Cons:
- One bad streak = game over
- You need huge capital to absorb 6β10 losses
- Pressure builds with each loss, especially emotionally
Example: Lose 6 times in a row starting with $0.35 β your next stake is $22.40. Most traders donβt even have that left.
π’ PLS (Progressive Loss Scaling)
This is what we use on bots like Varus, Zuno, and Axon. Instead of doubling, we increase the stake slowly β based on controlled risk.
For example:
- Start: $0.35
- Lose β $0.70
- Lose again β $1.10
- Then back to base on a win
You can tweak the recovery steps, add buffers, and stop if needed.
β Pros:
- Much safer for small accounts
- Easy to recover without risking full balance
- Works great when paired with smart entry timing
β Cons:
- Slower recovery = more patience required
- Still needs discipline β or youβll spiral on a bad day
PLS vs Martingale β Head-to-Head Comparison
Feature | Martingale | PLS |
---|---|---|
Recovery Speed | Fast | Moderate |
Risk per loss | Grows rapidly | Grows slowly |
Suitable for | Big balances | Small to mid accounts |
Max loss protection | Low | High |
Mental stress | High | Manageable |
Real-world use | Rarely sustainable | Works with caps & logic |
No Bot Is Truly No-Loss. Here’s Why.
Markets β even synthetic ones β donβt move in your favor just because you want them to.
There are days where digit patterns shift unpredictably, volatility spikes, or the bot gets caught in a bad sequence. Thatβs normal. What matters is how your setup handles it.
Some reasons bots still lose:
- Entry timing is off (bad signal)
- You ignore a stop-loss or session limit
- Your internet delays or Deriv throttles execution
- You blindly trust a system with no real testing
If your bot doesnβt have an exit plan, a cap, or logic for when to stopβ¦ youβre not trading. Youβre gambling.
Real Session Results: What a Recovery Bot Actually Looks Like
Letβs talk numbers β not promises.
Session A (Axon – Over 2 bot)
- π’ 36 trades β 24 wins, 12 losses
- PLS recovery engaged after each dip
- Profit: $52.06 in under 5 minutes
Want to see how the Axon bot works under the hood?
This Over 2 strategy thrives when low digits (0β2) are quiet β and it recovers quickly using PLS when they spike. You can learn exactly how it enters trades, when it recovers, and how to set it up for your account size.
π Read the full Axon bot guide here
β
Youβll be able to demo trade it yourself in under 5 minutes.
Session B (Varus – Under 5 bot)
- π’ 11 trades β 6 wins, 5 losses
- Steady recoveries, no stress
- Profit: $52.11 in 4 minutes
These arenβt flukes. Theyβre what happens when a recovery bot is used with:
- Proper entry conditions
- Reasonable targets
- Clear exit limits
No magic. Just logic.
Curious how the Varus bot keeps bouncing back from losses?
This Under 5 bot takes smart entries when high digits (5β9) dominate β and uses a safer recovery method to climb back after dips. If you want to understand the logic and test it risk-free on a demo account, start here:
π Read the full Varus bot guide here
β
Youβll be able to start running it on demo in just 5 minutes.
Safe Bot Configurations for Small & Medium Accounts
Hereβs a cheat sheet to keep your recovery realistic and manageable:
π° $10 Account
- Base Stake: $0.35
- Daily Target: $0.90
- Max Safe Losses: 4
- Recommended Bot: Varus or Zuno
π Read how the Zuno (Under 9) bot works here β itβs a safe starter bot that switches to Under 5 when needed.
π° $30 Account
- Base Stake: $0.50
- Daily Target: $1.50β$2.00
- Max Safe Losses: 6
- Recommended Bot: Axon or Varus
π° $50 Account
- Base Stake: $0.75
- Daily Target: $2.50β$3.00
- Max Safe Losses: 7
- Recommended Bot: Axon or Kiro
π Read how the Kiro (Over 4) bot works here β it targets digits 5β9 and recovers smartly when the 0β4 range fades.
π° $100+ Account
- Base Stake: $1.00β$2.00
- Daily Target: $4.00β$8.00
- Max Safe Losses: 8β10
- Recommended Bot: Any (with PLS enabled)
β
Tip: Start with demo, test for 2β3 days, and only go live once youβve hit target consistently.
β
Stop once your daily profit is reached β don’t let greed reverse the gains.
Final Thoughts β No Magic, Just Management
Youβll see the hype. No loss Deriv Bots promising the moon. Recovery plans that βnever fail.β
But what actually works?
β
Smart entry timing
β
PLS-based recovery
β
Discipline to stop
Itβs not flashy, but itβs repeatable. Thatβs what real trading is about.
β
Want to try recovery bots with proper safety logic?
Before you dive in, make sure to go through our step-by-step setup guide β it walks you through everything:
- How to create and connect your Deriv account
- How to set tick duration correctly
- Risk management tips to avoid blowing your balance
- Why journaling is essential and how to do it
- Full setup screenshots for beginners
π Read the full setup guide here:
https://synthetics.info/connect-deriv-account-bot-platform/
Once you’re readyβ¦
π Access our recommended bot platform here
Itβs completely free to use, works with both demo and real accounts, and includes all five recovery bots (Zuno, Kiro, Varus, Axon, Orix) ready to trade.
Switch between bots, test strategies, and manage risk β all in one place.
π¬ Whatβs Been Your Experience with the βNo Lossβ Bot Hype?
Have you ever chased a so-called βno lossβ Deriv bot? What happened β and what did you learn?
Weβd love to hear your story. Whether it worked for a while or ended in losses, your experience can help others avoid the same mistakes. If you could give one piece of advice to a newbie searching for these bots today, what would it be?
π Drop your thoughts in the comments β someone out there needs to hear it.
FAQs On No Loss Deriv Bots
No. No system is immune to losses. But with PLS or smart setups, you can recover most sessions safely.
Not really. It recovers fast but fails fast too. PLS is more durable if used correctly.
It depends on your scaling plan and account size β but most of our setups can absorb 5β8 small losses without wiping out.
Try Zuno (Under 9) or Varus (Under 5) with low stakes and daily stop targets.
Use tick history in demo, journal 10β20 sessions, and test during different market hours.
PLS (Progressive Loss Scaling) is the safest method because it increases stake gradually, reducing risk during losing streaks. Unlike Martingale, it doesnβt double aggressively β making it more sustainable for small to medium accounts.
Other Posts You May Be Interested In
10 Least Volatile Volatility Indices on Deriv (Full 2025 Guide) π’
Not every trading session calls for chasing wild spikes. Sometimes the goal is precision, consistency, [...]
AvaTrade Review 2024: πIs AvaTrade a Good Forex Broker?
Overall, Avatrade can be summarised as a credible and trustworthy regulated broker with an overall trust rating of 94 [...]
HFM Copy Trading Review: β» Copy Top Traders Today!
In this HFM copy trading review, we’ll cover everything you need to know about the [...]
How To Withdraw From Deriv Account π° (Complete 2025 Guide)
Withdrawing from Deriv is a simple process, but it can be tricky if you are [...]
Deriv Review 2025: Is Deriv a Trustworthy Broker? π
Overall, our comprehensive Deriv review found that this broker is trustworthy and reliable as it [...]
Best Synthetic Indices for Beginners on Deriv in 2025 π€
When I first dove into synthetic indices back in 2016, there were only a handfulβand [...]